Executive Summary / Key Takeaways

• The November 2025 separation of Qnity Electronics marks the culmination of a decade-long portfolio transformation that began with the Chemours spin-off in 2015, leaving DuPont as a focused industrial company with 50% of revenue in high-growth Healthcare & Water businesses targeting 5% organic growth.
• New DuPont is guiding to 3-4% organic growth with 150-200 basis points of margin expansion through 2028, driven by the 80/20 framework , stranded cost removal, and differential investment in secular growth markets, implying a structural improvement in earnings power.
• The $4.2 billion cash infusion from the Qnity separation enables immediate debt reduction and a $2 billion share repurchase authorization, supporting capital returns while maintaining a pro forma leverage ratio below 2x, providing financial flexibility for M&A in Healthcare & Water.
• Management is actively pursuing a valuation re-rating, arguing DuPont should trade at multi-industrial multiples rather than chemical-company multiples, supported by superior margins (targeting mid-20s EBITDA margins), lower cyclicality, and a transformed portfolio.
• The primary risks to this thesis are execution on margin expansion in the Diversified Industrials segment, continued softness in construction markets (Shelter business down 4% in 2025), and whether the market will award the desired re-rating in a challenging industrial environment.

Setting the Scene: The New DuPont Emerges

DuPont de Nemours, Inc., incorporated in 2015 and headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware, has spent the past decade systematically dismantling its legacy chemical empire to rebuild a focused multi-industrial company. The July 2015 spin-off of Chemours (CC) (Performance Chemicals) and the June 2019 separation of Corteva (CTVA) (Agriculture) were merely preludes to the main event: the November 1, 2025 separation of its Electronics business into Qnity Electronics, Inc. This final transformation leaves DuPont with two reportable segments effective Q4 2025: Healthcare Water Technologies and Diversified Industrials.

Why does this matter? Because the market still views DuPont through a chemical-company lens, applying cyclical valuation multiples to what is now a portfolio of high-margin, technology-enabled industrial businesses. The new structure concentrates 50% of revenue in Healthcare & Water, which grew at high single digits organically in Q3 2025 and targets 5% average growth through 2028. These are secular growth markets driven by water scarcity, biopharma expansion, and medical device innovation—not cyclical commodity chemicals. The remaining Diversified Industrials segment, while exposed to construction cycles, is being actively optimized through the 80/20 framework to improve margins and prune low-return businesses.

The industry structure reinforces this positioning. In water filtration, DuPont is the largest player across reverse osmosis, ion exchange, and ultrafiltration technologies, giving it pricing power and scale advantages. In healthcare, Tyvek medical packaging holds dominant market share with applications that cannot be easily substituted. In industrial materials, proprietary brands like MOLYKOTE lubricants and Vespel parts command premium pricing for specialized applications. This is not a commodity chemical portfolio; it is a collection of industrial technology franchises.

Technology, Products, and Strategic Differentiation

DuPont's competitive moat rests on three pillars: proprietary materials science, deep application engineering, and integrated solutions that create high switching costs. The Tyvek® APX™ launch in November 2025 exemplifies this advantage—offering enhanced breathability for protective garments while maintaining protection and durability. Why does this matter? Because it demonstrates DuPont's ability to command premium pricing through continuous innovation in mature product lines, supporting margins in the Diversified Industrials segment where competitors face commoditization pressure.

In Healthcare Water Technologies, the acquisition of Sinochem Ningbo RO Memtech Co., Ltd. for $1.8 billion (closed October 2025) adds manufacturing capacity in China without transferring core technology. This enables a "local-for-local" strategy to serve Asia-Pacific water purification demand while protecting DuPont's leading membrane technologies developed in the U.S. The water business benefits from secular tailwinds: industrial water reuse mandates, desalination projects, and microelectronics water purification requirements. Management notes emerging opportunities in PFAS cleanup and direct lithium extraction could provide additional upside.

The Diversified Industrials segment is undergoing active portfolio pruning. The pending $1.8 billion sale of the Aramids business (Kevlar and Nomex) to TJC LP, expected to close in Q1 2026, reflects a strategic shift away from commoditizing materials. This frees capital and management attention to focus on higher-return opportunities while the 80/20 framework, led by an ITW veteran, targets margin improvement through customer and product line rationalization. The goal is to shift from a 50-50 mix of healthcare/water and diversified businesses to a 2/3-1/3 split favoring secular growth.

Financial Performance & Segment Dynamics: Evidence of Transformation

Q3 2025 results provide the first clear look at the pre-separation DuPont, and the numbers support the transformation thesis. Total company organic sales grew 6% (4% excluding a $70 million order timing shift), with ElectronicsCo delivering 10% organic growth and IndustrialsCo delivering 4%. The timing shift represents system cutover activities ahead of the separation, indicating operational complexity but also demonstrating underlying demand strength that pulled orders forward. The underlying 4% growth rate aligns with new DuPont's medium-term targets.

The segment performance reveals the quality differential. ElectronicsCo (now Qnity) generated 31.6% EBITDA margins, down 140 basis points year-over-year due to unfavorable mix and currency headwinds. This margin compression highlights that even in a high-growth, high-margin business, DuPont was experiencing pressure from AI-driven technology ramps requiring growth investments. As an independent company, Qnity can now focus exclusively on semiconductor market opportunities without competing for capital with industrial businesses.

IndustrialsCo delivered 25.9% EBITDA margins, flat year-over-year but absorbing currency headwinds. Within this segment, Healthcare and Water grew high single digits organically, driven by medical packaging, biopharma processing, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange. Diversified Industrials grew low single digits, with Industrial Technologies offsetting continued construction softness. This mix shift indicates the portfolio is already rotating toward higher-growth, higher-margin businesses, supporting the margin expansion thesis.

Cash flow performance validates the financial transformation. Transaction-adjusted free cash flow for Q3 2025 was $576 million with 126% conversion, bringing year-to-date conversion to 90%. This demonstrates that DuPont's earnings quality is high and that the company can fund its transformation internally while returning capital to shareholders. The $4.2 billion cash infusion from Qnity, combined with $1.8 billion in expected Aramids proceeds, provides $6 billion for debt reduction and capital returns.

Outlook, Management Guidance, and Execution Risk

Management's guidance for the new DuPont reveals confidence in the transformation thesis. Full-year 2025 operating EBITDA guidance was raised to $1.6 billion, with adjusted EPS expected at $1.66 (16% year-over-year growth). For 2026-2028, targets include 3-4% organic growth, 150-200 basis points of margin expansion, 8-10% EPS growth, and >90% free cash flow conversion. These targets imply a fundamental re-rating of DuPont's earnings power, with margin expansion coming from three sources: 40 basis points from stranded cost removal (completed by end of year 2), up to 50 basis points from productivity gains, and the remainder from revenue mix shift toward Healthcare & Water.

The Q4 2025 guidance shows normalization. Estimated net sales of $1.685 billion imply 1% organic growth when adjusting for the Q3 timing shift, but a reported 1% decline versus prior year. This demonstrates management's conservative approach and sets a realistic baseline for 2026 performance. The key swing factor is the Shelter business, expected to be down 4% for full-year 2025. Management notes that normalizing Shelter to flat in 2026 would provide a "nice lift" to overall growth, suggesting upside if construction markets recover.

Healthcare & Water is positioned as the growth engine. Management expects this segment to achieve 5% organic growth on average, with healthcare "north of that average" driven by biopharma processing, medical device growth, and medical packaging stabilization. The water business benefits from strong demand in industrial purification and desalination, with the Sinochem acquisition adding local capacity to capture Asia-Pacific growth. This provides a visible path to the 3-4% overall organic growth target, with Healthcare & Water contributing 2.5% growth as 50% of the portfolio.

Risks and Asymmetries: What Could Break the Thesis

The primary risk is execution on margin expansion in Diversified Industrials. The 80/20 framework requires disciplined pruning of customers and products, which could create near-term revenue headwinds if not managed carefully. This is significant because 150-200 basis points of margin expansion over three years is aggressive for industrial businesses, and any shortfall would undermine the multi-industrial re-rating thesis. Management's hiring of ITW and Danaher veterans provides confidence, but the construction market's continued softness (Shelter down 4% in 2025) limits near-term upside.

China exposure represents a geopolitical risk. China and Hong Kong accounted for 19% of consolidated net sales in 2024, with Qnity generating $1.4 billion in sales to China. While management notes that only $200 million represents finished product exports from the U.S. (mitigating tariff impact), the SAMR antitrust investigation into Tyvek (suspended July 2025) highlights regulatory risks. Any escalation in trade tensions or regulatory action could disrupt a meaningful portion of revenue, particularly in water and healthcare where local-for-local strategy is critical.

PFAS liabilities, while being managed, remain an overhang. The New Jersey settlement ($177 million NPV over 25 years) resolves state claims, but approximately 10,000 personal injury cases remain in the AFFF MDL . Management's confidence that other state settlements will fall within 3-7% of the MOU framework and be structured over long payment periods suggests cash flow impact will be immaterial. However, any adverse ruling in personal injury cases could create material liability not covered by the MOU.

The valuation re-rating is not guaranteed. Management explicitly stated the Street is "confused about our numbers" and that "there's still a view that potentially we're a chemical company." This implies that even if DuPont executes perfectly on its operational targets, the market may continue applying chemical-company multiples (7-8x EBITDA) rather than multi-industrial multiples (12-15x EBITDA), limiting upside. The company's forward P/E of 9.06x and EV/EBITDA of 7.31x suggest the market remains skeptical.

Competitive Context and Positioning

Comparing DuPont to named peers reveals the valuation disconnect. Dow Inc. trades at a lower EV/Revenue (0.77x compared to DuPont's 1.92x) but generates gross margins of just 7.22% versus DuPont's 37.12%, reflecting Dow's commodity chemical exposure. This demonstrates that DuPont's portfolio already commands a premium, yet its EV/EBITDA of 7.31x is below Dow's 8.96x, suggesting the market isn't fully recognizing the quality differential.

3M Company (MMM) trades at 4.01x EV/Revenue and 16.17x EV/EBITDA with 40.98% gross margins, closer to DuPont's profile. However, MMM's growth has been modest (revenue up ~3.5% in Q3 2025) and carries legacy litigation overhang. DuPont's 6% organic growth and cleaner legal profile suggest it should trade at least in line with MMM's multiples, implying 30-40% upside if the re-rating occurs.

Eastman Chemical and Celanese (CE) show the challenges of pure-play chemical models. EMN's revenue declines and margin pressure reflect cyclical headwinds, while CE's high debt-to-equity (3.02x) and negative ROE (-50.51%) highlight balance sheet risks. DuPont's net debt-to-EBITDA of 1.7x and positive ROE (3.22%) demonstrate superior financial health. This comparison validates management's argument that DuPont's transformed portfolio deserves classification among multi-industrial peers, not chemical companies.

Valuation Context

At $39.77 per share, DuPont trades at 1.33x price-to-sales, 7.31x EV/EBITDA, and 14.81x price-to-free-cash-flow based on TTM metrics. These multiples reflect a market pricing DuPont as a cyclical industrial rather than a focused multi-industrial company with secular growth drivers. The forward P/E of 9.06x suggests skepticism about earnings sustainability, despite management's confidence in 8-10% EPS growth through 2028.

The company's balance sheet supports valuation expansion. With $2 billion in cash (pro forma $1 billion post-separation), $4.2 billion from Qnity for debt reduction, and $1.8 billion expected from Aramids, DuPont will have repaid approximately $4 billion in debt by early 2026. This reduces interest expense (currently creating 200 basis points of tax headwind) and enables the $2 billion share repurchase program, with $500 million ASR expected immediately. The pro forma net debt-to-EBITDA of 1.7x provides flexibility for M&A in Healthcare & Water, where management has a "robust pipeline."

Relative to multi-industrial peers, DuPont's metrics appear conservative. Companies like Danaher and ITW trade at 15-20x EV/EBITDA with similar margin profiles and lower growth rates. If DuPont achieves its 2026-2028 targets and the market awards a 12x EV/EBITDA multiple (still a discount to multi-industrial peers), the stock would trade at approximately $55-60 per share, representing 40-50% upside from current levels. This quantifies the potential re-rating opportunity if management successfully executes its strategy and convinces the market of its new identity.

Conclusion

DuPont's separation of Qnity completes a transformation that has been a decade in the making, creating a focused multi-industrial company with 50% of revenue in secular-growth Healthcare & Water businesses. The Q3 2025 results demonstrate that this portfolio can deliver 4% organic growth with 25.9% EBITDA margins even in a challenging industrial environment, while the Qnity separation provides $4.2 billion in cash for debt reduction and capital returns.

The investment thesis hinges on two factors: execution of the 150-200 basis points margin expansion plan through the 80/20 framework and portfolio pruning, and successful re-rating from chemical-company to multi-industrial valuation multiples. Management's hiring of Danaher (DHR) and ITW (ITW) veterans provides confidence in operational execution, while the stark contrast with struggling chemical peers like Dow (DOW) and Eastman (EMN) supports the re-rating argument.

The primary risks are construction market softness limiting near-term growth, China exposure creating geopolitical headwinds, and the market's potential reluctance to award higher multiples. However, with $6 billion in separation proceeds, a $2 billion buyback authorization, and a clear path to 8-10% EPS growth, DuPont has multiple levers to drive shareholder value even if the re-rating takes time. For investors willing to look past the chemical-company legacy, the new DuPont offers a compelling combination of secular growth, margin expansion, and capital returns at a valuation that doesn't reflect its transformed quality.