HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK)

Executive Summary / Key Takeaways

• Strategic Pivot Under New Leadership: CEO Michael Hollis is explicitly ending the company's "growth at all cost mentality," forcing a necessary shift toward balance sheet repair and disciplined capital allocation after years of debt-fueled expansion that left HPK with a 0.73 debt-to-equity ratio and governance concerns.

• Operational Excellence Obscured by Financial Leverage: The company has delivered genuine operational improvements including 400% reserve replacement over three years, 17% reduction in lease operating expenses, and simul-frac technology saving $400,000 per well, but these achievements remain overshadowed by balance sheet constraints that keep the stock trading at just 0.38 times book value.

• Liquidity Discount Poised for Resolution: With HighPeak Energy Partners I and II controlling over 60% of the 125 million outstanding shares, the stock suffers from a severe float shortage that depresses institutional ownership and valuation; planned distributions in 2026-2027 could unlock a meaningful re-rating if executed methodically.

• Downside Protection with Asymmetric Upside: Low breakeven costs in the low-$40s per barrel, combined with hedging over 50% of oil production and 90% of gas at $4.43/MMBtu, provide substantial protection in a weak commodity environment while preserving full exposure to any price recovery.

• Critical Execution Period Ahead: The next 12-18 months represent a make-or-break phase where management must demonstrate consistent debt reduction, production stability within cash flow, and successful transition away from controlled-company status to rebuild market confidence and justify a return to normalized valuation multiples.

Setting the Scene: A Pure-Play Permian at an Inflection Point

HighPeak Energy, founded in October 2019 and headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, operates as a single-segment exploration and production company concentrated in the Midland Basin of West Texas. The company's asset base centers on two contiguous core areas—Flat Top and Signal Peak—spanning approximately 154,650 gross acres, with roughly 70% held by production and over 90% of net operated acreage supporting horizontal wells with lateral lengths of 10,000 feet or greater. This concentrated footprint in Howard and Borden Counties positions HPK in one of the most oil-rich windows of the Permian, where management claims breakeven costs for its Middle Spraberry wells in the low- to mid-$40s per barrel.

The industry structure surrounding HPK is defined by relentless capital intensity, commodity price volatility, and scale advantages that favor larger operators. The Permian Basin has experienced significant turbulence, with OPEC+ unwinding production cuts and U.S. tariffs on steel imports directly impacting drilling costs. HPK's tubular goods expenses, which represent approximately 8% of typical AFEs , have risen roughly 3% due to tariffs. A potential 25% tariff on these goods could increase overall well costs by about 2% if applied comprehensively. These macro headwinds compound the company's internal challenges, creating a crucible moment where operational efficiency must overcome financial fragility.

Within this landscape, HPK competes against mid-cap peers like Magnolia Oil & Gas , Matador Resources , SM Energy (SM), and Civitas Resources (CIVI). Each of these competitors operates at a substantially larger scale, with market capitalizations ranging from $2.2 billion to $5.5 billion compared to HPK's $620 million. This size disparity translates into tangible disadvantages: HPK's smaller scale yields notably higher per-unit operating costs, weaker bargaining power with service providers, and limited financial flexibility. However, HPK's concentrated acreage position provides deeper geological expertise in its specific operating window, potentially enabling superior well-level economics if the company can execute consistently.

History with Purpose: How Growth at All Costs Created Today's Reckoning

HighPeak's four-year history reveals a classic tale of aggressive expansion followed by necessary retrenchment. The company was built through organic acreage assembly, expanding its Flat Top position by 30,000 net acres over 15 months while achieving a 400% reserve replacement ratio over three years, almost exclusively through organic growth. This rapid asset accumulation was funded through debt, culminating in a $1.2 billion Term Loan Credit Agreement secured in September 2023, followed by a $100 million Senior Credit Facility in November 2023.

The consequences of this strategy became apparent in 2024 and 2025. While the two-rig program delivered a 10% year-over-year production increase and a 17% reduction in lease operating expenses per BOE, the company accumulated debt at a high cost of capital—SOFR plus 750 basis points, translating to roughly 13% average interest expense in 2024, or about $150 million annually. Management's own assessment acknowledges the problem: "Our debt is high, and the market has told us exactly what it thinks about that. For a while, we drifted without a clear long-term plan, and it showed."

The August 2025 refinancing extended maturities to September 2028 and deferred quarterly amortization payments until September 2026, providing breathing room but not solving the underlying leverage issue. More significantly, the September 2025 leadership transition marked a definitive break from the past. Jack Hightower's retirement and Michael Hollis's appointment as CEO, combined with Jason Edgeworth becoming independent Chairman and the establishment of fully independent board committees, signaled that governance reform was not cosmetic but structural. This matters because it addresses one of the primary reasons for HPK's valuation discount: controlled-company status that led to poor governance quality scores from ISS, Glass Lewis, and rating agencies.

Technology and Operational Differentiation: Efficiency Gains That Could Change the Cost Structure

HighPeak's operational improvements represent a step-change in capital efficiency that has not yet been reflected in valuation. The company has reduced spud-to-spud timing from 14 days to 11 days, a greater than 20% improvement that enables a single rig to drill over 30 wells per year compared to the previous 25. This efficiency gain translates directly into lower cost per foot and faster inventory conversion.

The simul-frac technology , successfully deployed on the Lorin Pad in Borden County, saves approximately $400,000 per well by reducing completion time for four 15,000-foot laterals from 25-28 days to 11-14 days. Crucially, these savings were not factored into the 2025 capital budget due to a conservative mindset, meaning they represent pure upside to future cost guidance.

The Middle Spraberry delineation adds another layer of potential value. The first test well cumulated over 170,000 barrels of oil plus associated gas in less than one year, outperforming initial type curves and demonstrating breakevens in the low- to mid-$40s. With approximately 200 additional locations expected to move into the sub-$50 breakeven inventory, HPK has meaningfully expanded its development runway without additional acreage acquisitions.

Infrastructure investments further support long-term efficiency. The Flat Top solar farm has been online for over a year, generating approximately $810,000 in power savings from June through December 2024 while reducing Scope 2 CO2 emissions by over 4,600 metric tons. The company-owned water system, overhead electrical power distribution, and expanded low-pressure gas gathering create a life-of-field infrastructure that management claims can support up to six to eight rigs if needed, while also enabling the company to hold all 143,000 net acres with less than one rig running if prices collapse.

Financial Performance: Operational Progress Masked by Leverage

Third quarter 2025 results illustrate the tension between operational efficiency and financial constraints. The company reported a net loss of $18.3 million compared to net income of $49.9 million in Q3 2024, driven by an $82.7 million reduction in revenues from a 25% decrease in average realized commodity prices per BOE and a 7% decline in daily sales volumes. Crude oil sales fell 29.5% year-over-year to $190.8 million, while NGL and natural gas sales surged 102.9% to $1.9 million, partially offsetting the oil decline.

The revenue mix shift reflects resolved midstream constraints. Gas and NGL production increased as third-party partners expanded takeaway capacity and connected central tank batteries to the gathering system, lowering field-wide pressures. Management expects the oil percentage to trend closer to 70% at any reasonable cadence, down from the 85% recorded in the first nine months of 2025. This matters because it diversifies revenue streams and reduces dependence on crude oil price volatility, though current gas realizations remain challenged.

Cost control efforts show mixed results. Lease operating expenses decreased 6% in Q3 2025 but increased 4% for the nine-month period due to higher expense workover costs, increased electricity charges from operating more wells, and higher pumper costs. The DDA rate fell 21% to $22.87 per BOE from $28.91, reflecting the significant reserve additions at year-end 2024. Production and ad valorem taxes declined 35% in Q3, directly tracking lower commodity prices.

The balance sheet remains the central concern. As of September 30, 2025, HPK had $1.2 billion outstanding under its Term Loan Credit Agreement and $93.1 million of available borrowing capacity under its Senior Credit Facility. The company maintains over $200-250 million of liquidity, which management describes as "a number that we feel pretty comfortable with." However, the debt burden consumes approximately $150 million in annual cash interest expense at current rates, creating a significant hurdle for free cash flow generation.

Outlook and Management Guidance: A Tiered Approach to Capital Discipline

Management has articulated a clear strategic framework tied directly to commodity price scenarios, marking a departure from the previous growth-at-any-price approach. The 2025 capital budget remains $375-405 million for drilling and completions, plus $40-50 million for field infrastructure and $33-35 million for one-time projects, representing a more than 20% reduction from 2024 levels.

For 2026, management projects an all-in maintenance capital budget that could be approximately 30% less than 2025, assuming no new acreage additions and a decreasing base infrastructure budget. This potential 30% reduction matters because it suggests HPK is approaching an inflection point where production can be maintained with substantially less capital, improving free cash flow generation and debt repayment capacity.

The three-scenario framework provides transparency into decision-making:

• Bear Case (oil below $60/barrel): Focus on operating within cash flow with less than a two-rig program, accepting a moderate production decline to preserve liquidity.
• Base Case ($60-70/barrel): Maintain a two-rig development program to hold production flat, generate free cash flow, and allocate additional cash to prudent debt paydown while maintaining the current dividend.
• Bull Case (above $70/barrel): Potentially increase to two rigs or slightly more for moderate production growth, accelerating debt reduction and considering additional shareholder returns after achieving reasonable leverage.

Management emphasizes that even in a maintenance capital mode, production could see a slight build as the corporate decline rate moderates from mid- to high-30% toward 1.5-2% annual improvement. This decline rate improvement, combined with drilling efficiencies delivering 5% more lateral footage year-over-year for substantially lower capital, creates a potential path to per-share value growth even without commodity price tailwinds.

Risks and Asymmetries: What Could Break the Thesis

The most material risk remains financial leverage. While the August 2025 refinancing extended maturities and deferred amortization, HPK still carries $1.2 billion in Term Loan debt at SOFR plus 750 basis points. Management states they can pay down debt at par with no penalty and intend to use free cash flow for absolute debt reduction, but any sustained weakness in commodity prices or operational execution could strain liquidity and limit financial flexibility. The company's own assessment is blunt: "HighPeak is overlevered. That is a true statement."

Scale disadvantage creates persistent competitive pressure. HPK's $620 million market cap and approximately 53,000 BOE per day of production are fractions of peers like Matador (approximately 145,000 BOE per day, $5.5 billion market cap) or SM Energy (approximately 160,000 BOE per day, $2.2 billion market cap). This size disparity results in notably higher per-unit operating costs, weaker negotiating leverage with service providers, and less efficient access to capital markets. In an industry where scale drives cost structure, HPK's niche position requires flawless execution to compete.

Execution risk under new leadership cannot be dismissed. While Michael Hollis brings industry respect and a clear mandate for discipline, the company must simultaneously manage production decline, integrate new technology, reduce debt, and transition away from controlled-company status. Any misstep in this multi-variable optimization could derail the turnaround narrative.

Commodity price exposure remains despite hedging. While HPK has layered on gas hedges at "fantastic prices" of $4.43 and maintains oil hedges covering over 50% of second-half 2025 volumes with a weighted average floor above $62 per barrel, the company remains leveraged to oil prices for the unhedged portion and for long-term value creation. A prolonged period of sub-$60 oil would stress the base case assumptions and likely force a shift to the bear case scenario of managed decline.

The share distribution plan, while potentially solving the float issue, carries its own risks. If HighPeak Energy Partners I and II distribute shares too quickly or if market absorption is weak, the stock could face additional selling pressure. Conversely, if distributions are delayed or canceled, the governance overhang and liquidity discount would persist.

Valuation Context: Pricing in Leverage and Governance Risk

At $4.91 per share, HighPeak Energy trades at a market capitalization of $620 million and an enterprise value of $1.65 billion, reflecting a business that generates approximately $1.07 billion in annual revenue but carries $1.2 billion in debt. The valuation metrics reveal a company priced for distress rather than operational competence: price-to-book of 0.38, EV/EBITDA of 2.49, and price-to-operating cash flow of 1.11.

These multiples compare favorably to peers on a cash flow basis but reflect a substantial discount on asset value. Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY) trades at 2.15 times book value and 4.95 times EV/EBITDA, while Matador (MTDR) commands 1.00 times book and 3.47 times EV/EBITDA. HPK's discount stems directly from its leverage and controlled-company status, not from operational inferiority. The company's 17.28% operating margin and 79.13% gross margin are competitive within the peer group, suggesting the underlying assets generate attractive returns when not burdened by financing costs.

The 3.26% dividend yield provides income while investors wait for the turnaround to materialize, though the payout ratio of 41.03% indicates limited room for increases until debt reduction progresses. With over $200 million in liquidity and no near-term debt maturities, the company has a reasonable runway to execute its strategy, but the market is clearly demanding proof of concept before awarding a re-rating.

Conclusion: A Necessary Transition with Asymmetric Potential

HighPeak Energy stands at a critical juncture where operational excellence and financial reality are finally being forced into alignment. The company's four-year track record of reserve growth, cost reduction, and technological innovation demonstrates that its Midland Basin acreage is not just viable but potentially superior. However, the "growth at all cost mentality" that funded this expansion has left HPK with a balance sheet that obscures these achievements and a governance structure that repels institutional capital.

The appointment of Michael Hollis and the board's independence mark a definitive pivot toward disciplined capital allocation. If management can deliver on its promise to pay down debt with free cash flow, complete the share distribution to increase float, and maintain production within cash flow at current commodity prices, the valuation gap to peers should narrow meaningfully. The operational improvements—simul-frac savings, faster drilling times, and declining corporate decline rates—provide a foundation for sustainable free cash flow generation that did not exist under the previous growth paradigm.

The investment thesis hinges on execution of this transition, not on commodity price speculation. With downside protection from hedging and low breakeven costs, and upside optionality from a potential re-rating as governance improves and debt declines, HPK offers an asymmetric risk/reward profile for investors willing to own the company through this transformation. The next 12-18 months will determine whether HighPeak becomes a disciplined value creator or remains a cautionary tale about the perils of leverage in a cyclical business.