Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR)

Executive Summary / Key Takeaways

• Cyclical Purge with Margin Resilience: Despite a brutal 43% revenue collapse in Q3 2025, Miller Industries expanded gross margins to 14.2% through disciplined cost management and a favorable product mix shift, demonstrating pricing power that separates it from typical industrial casualties.

• Military Vehicle Inflection Point: A $230 million Canadian military contract starting in 2026, combined with surging global RFQ activity, positions military recovery vehicles as a "substantial tailwind" that could transform Miller's revenue profile by 2027-2028, a catalyst the market has yet to recognize.

• Fortress Balance Sheet Enables Counter-Cyclical Positioning: With debt-to-equity of just 0.11, $38 million in cash, and $55 million in untapped credit, Miller is using its financial strength to invest in automation, acquire European competitors (Omars S.p.A), and prepare for recovery while weaker rivals retreat.

• Market Leadership with Durable Moats: As the world's largest towing equipment manufacturer with ~42% North American market share, Miller's multi-brand portfolio (Century, Vulcan, Jige, Boniface) and exclusive global distribution network create switching costs that protect margins even during downturns.

• Asymmetric Risk/Reward at Current Valuation: Trading at 0.53x sales and 15.2x earnings despite generating positive free cash flow through the trough, Miller offers exposure to a cyclical recovery, military growth optionality, and potential multiple re-rating with limited downside given its balance sheet and market position.

Setting the Scene: The World's Towing Equipment Backbone

Miller Industries, incorporated in 1990 and operating from manufacturing facilities in Tennessee, Pennsylvania, France, and the United Kingdom, has spent three decades building what management calls "the world's largest manufacturer of towing and recovery equipment." This isn't marketing hyperbole; it's a structural reality that shapes every aspect of the company's economics. When a municipality needs a heavy-duty wrecker, a towing operator needs a reliable carrier, or a military needs battlefield recovery vehicles, Miller's brands—Century, Vulcan, Jige, Boniface, and others—dominate the specification sheets.

The company makes money by designing and manufacturing the bodies for wreckers and car carriers that mount on third-party chassis, selling through a network of independent distributors who, critically, don't carry competing brands. This exclusive distribution creates a powerful moat: once a distributor invests in Miller's training, inventory, and service capabilities, switching costs become prohibitive. The business model generates revenue across three weight classes (light, medium, heavy-duty) and multiple end markets (commercial towing, military, transport), with geographic diversification that provides natural hedges against regional downturns.

Miller's place in the industry value chain is both a strength and a vulnerability. As an upfitter rather than a chassis manufacturer, the company depends on timely chassis deliveries from OEMs like Ford (F) and Daimler (DTG), but it also avoids the capital intensity and cyclicality of vehicle manufacturing. This positioning allowed Miller to generate 15.2% gross margins in the first nine months of 2025 even as revenue fell 40%, a performance that pure-play chassis manufacturers couldn't match. The company's strategy centers on three pillars: brand portfolio breadth, global distribution scale, and continuous manufacturing optimization through automation and vertical integration.

Technology, Products, and Strategic Differentiation: More Than Welded Steel

Miller's competitive advantage begins with its brand architecture. Century and Vulcan dominate North American heavy-duty recovery, while Jige and Boniface provide entrenched positions in European markets where local specifications and relationships create barriers to entry. This multi-brand strategy prevents competitors from gaining scale economies in any single niche. A regional competitor might excel in light-duty wreckers, but it can't match Miller's R&D efficiency across the full spectrum of recovery equipment.

The company's 2019 opening of a dedicated R&D facility in Chattanooga, Tennessee, combined with $82 million in domestic plant modernization between 2017-2021, created capabilities that competitors can't easily replicate. The investment in sophisticated robotics and advanced manufacturing technologies isn't just about cost reduction—it enables component redesign for supply chain flexibility, a critical advantage when tariffs and geopolitical tensions disrupt traditional sourcing. When Miller invested in Southern Hydraulic Cylinder in May 2023, it vertically integrated a key component, reducing supplier leverage and improving margin capture.

This manufacturing sophistication translates to tangible customer benefits. Miller's equipment offers higher reliability and lower total cost of ownership, which deeply matters for towing operators facing elevated insurance premiums and interest rates. The product mix shift that improved gross margins in 2025—more body deliveries relative to chassis shipments—demonstrates the company's ability to capture value from its engineering investments even when end-market demand weakens. While competitors struggle with commodity pricing, Miller's brand premium and performance differentiation support pricing power.

Financial Performance & Segment Dynamics: The Trough Is Shallower Than It Looks

The headline numbers paint a grim picture: Q3 2025 revenue of $178.7 million, down 43.1% year-over-year; nine-month revenue of $618.4 million, down 40.3%. Yet these figures tell a story of deliberate inventory normalization, not structural demand collapse. The revenue decline stems primarily from two factors: inconsistent chassis deliveries from OEMs in 2024 that created channel inventory buildup, and Miller's proactive decision to reduce production in 2025 to accelerate inventory clearing. This distinction is important because the company is sacrificing short-term sales to restore channel health, rather than losing market share.

The gross margin improvement to 14.2% in Q3 (from 13.4%) and 15.2% for the nine-month period (from 13.3%) reveals the true strength of Miller's position. The nine-month period saw a 190 basis point expansion during a 40% revenue decline, which is extraordinary. It occurred because the product mix shifted toward higher-margin body deliveries and because Miller implemented targeted cost reductions, including a workforce reduction of approximately 150 positions in August 2025. The company is demonstrating that its cost structure is variable enough to protect profitability through the cycle, a hallmark of durable industrial franchises.

Cash flow performance validates this assessment. Operating cash flow of $49.9 million for the nine months increased 74.4% year-over-year, driven by working capital management as the company reduced inventory. Free cash flow remained positive even as the company invested $7.3 million in capex, primarily for automation. The balance sheet strengthened meaningfully: cash increased to $38.4 million, total debt decreased from $65 million to $45 million, and as of October 31, the company had further reduced borrowings to $35 million. This deleveraging during a cyclical trough is precisely what separates quality industrial companies from those that merely survive downturns.

Geographic segmentation reveals important divergences. North American sales plummeted 48.3% in Q3 to $148.0 million, reflecting the inventory overhang and the impact of new CARB regulations limiting diesel vehicle registrations in certain states. Conversely, foreign sales grew 10.6% to $30.6 million, with management noting "greater demand in Europe." This geographic split highlights the effectiveness of Miller's international diversification, providing growth offsets when the core U.S. market faces temporary headwinds. The December 2025 acquisition of Italian manufacturer Omars S.p.A for €17.5 million further deepens this European footprint.

Outlook, Management Guidance, and Execution Risk: 2026 Recovery and Beyond

Management's guidance for 2025 revenue of $750-800 million implies a Q4 run-rate that could range from approximately $132 million to $182 million, suggesting the worst of the inventory purge is behind them. More importantly, CEO Will Miller has expressed confidence that "we will enter into 2026 from a position of strength," citing three catalysts: normalized field inventory levels, accelerating European demand, and a "notable increase in Request For Quote activity for our military vehicles."

The military opportunity deserves particular attention. Miller was selected as Rheinmetall Canada's (RNMBF) supplier for 85 recovery vehicles worth $230 million, with production scheduled for late 2026 and predominantly in 2027-2028. While the revenue won't hit until 2027, the RFQ activity suggests this is the tip of a larger iceberg. Management believes "military recovery vehicles could be a substantial tailwind for us in future years," and they're taking steps to position production capacity accordingly. Military contracts are significant because they offer longer-term visibility, higher margins, and diversification from commercial cyclicality. For a company with prior annual revenue around $1.2 billion, a $230 million contract represents nearly 20% of that revenue, albeit spread over multiple years.

The CARB regulatory challenge, which limited diesel vehicle sales in certain states starting January 1, 2025, represents both risk and opportunity. While it contributed to the 2025 demand headwinds, Miller is working with suppliers to develop CARB-compliant chassis, with broader availability expected by early 2026. This proactive approach positions Miller to capture pent-up demand when the regulatory uncertainty clears, potentially creating a snap-back effect in affected markets.

Execution risk centers on the timing of inventory normalization and the company's ability to ramp production efficiently when demand returns. Management's comment that chassis inventory has "crossed below body inventory, which is ideal as historically this has led to the best dynamic for maximum flexibility at the distribution level," suggests the channel is approaching equilibrium. However, any delay in this normalization or further chassis supply disruptions could push the recovery into late 2026.

Risks and Asymmetries: What Could Break the Thesis

The primary risk isn't that Miller loses market share—it's that the cyclical recovery takes longer than anticipated. If field inventory remains elevated through 2026 due to persistent macroeconomic uncertainty or if interest rates stay high, depressing equipment purchases, revenue could remain depressed longer than management expects. This would pressure margins as fixed cost absorption suffers, potentially compressing the 14-15% gross margin range toward historical lows.

Chassis supplier dependency represents a structural vulnerability. With approximately 70% of builds requiring timely OEM chassis deliveries, any disruption—whether from semiconductor shortages, labor strikes, or production cuts—directly impacts Miller's ability to fulfill orders. The company's tariff mitigation strategy, including surcharges and strategic material accumulation, helps but doesn't eliminate the risk of supply chain shocks.

The CARB regulatory environment creates binary risk. While management is lobbying for federal preemption and developing compliant solutions, if additional states adopt near-zero emission standards before CARB-compliant chassis are widely available, Miller could face extended sales restrictions in key markets. This would delay the recovery and force the company to carry excess capacity longer, hurting returns on invested capital.

On the upside, military RFQ activity could accelerate beyond current expectations. If Miller secures additional contracts beyond the Canadian program, particularly in the U.S. or NATO markets, the military segment could become a more significant revenue driver sooner than the 2027-2028 timeline. This would diversify revenue, improve margins, and potentially justify a higher valuation multiple as the business model becomes less cyclical.

Valuation Context: Paying Trough Prices for Recovery Optionality

At $39.18 per share, Miller Industries trades at a market capitalization of $448 million and an enterprise value of $455 million, reflecting minimal net debt. The valuation multiples reflect cyclical depression: price-to-sales of 0.53x, price-to-operating cash flow of 11.75x, and price-to-free cash flow of 15.85x. These metrics price the company as if the 40% revenue decline represents a new normal, ignoring both the cyclical nature of the equipment market and the emerging military catalyst.

Comparing Miller to direct competitors reveals a significant discount. Oshkosh Corporation , with its Jerr-Dan towing division, trades at 0.92x sales and 12.93x earnings, despite growing its vocational segment 19% in Q3 2025. While Oshkosh (OSK) is more diversified, Miller's pure-play focus on towing equipment gives it higher brand loyalty and distribution exclusivity in its niche. Wabash National , competing in transport trailers, trades at just 0.47x sales but carries much higher debt (D/E of 1.09) and lower gross margins (7.27% vs Miller's 15.15%), reflecting its commodity-like positioning.

The Shyft Group (SHYF) and REV Group (REVG) trade at 0.55x and 1.16x sales respectively, but both have lower returns on assets and face their own cyclical pressures. Miller's combination of market leadership, balance sheet strength, and margin resilience justifies a premium to these peers, yet it trades at a discount to all but Wabash National (WNC). This valuation gap creates asymmetric risk/reward: if revenue merely recovers to 2024 levels ($1.04 billion), the stock would trade at 0.43x sales, an unsustainably low multiple for a market leader.

The company's capital allocation reinforces its confidence. Despite the downturn, Miller continued paying its 59th consecutive quarterly dividend ($0.20 per share, 2.05% yield) and repurchased $3.8 million of stock at an average price of $44.43 during the first nine months of 2025. Management stated that "repurchasing our shares represents one of the most attractive investments we can make," signaling they believe the stock is undervalued even after the decline from 2024 highs.

Conclusion: A Cyclical Leader Poised for Multi-Year Upside

Miller Industries is navigating a perfect storm of inventory normalization, regulatory headwinds, and macroeconomic pressure, yet its financial performance reveals a company that is not merely surviving but strengthening its competitive position. The 40% revenue decline is a channel-clearing exercise, not a market share loss, and the 190 basis points of gross margin expansion during this trough demonstrates pricing power that only market leaders possess.

The emerging military vehicle opportunity, highlighted by the $230 million Canadian contract and accelerating global RFQ activity, represents a potential step-change in Miller's growth trajectory. If military recovery vehicles become even 10-15% of revenue by 2028, they would diversify the business away from pure commercial cyclicality and support higher valuation multiples.

Trading at 0.53x sales with a fortress balance sheet, Miller offers investors a rare combination: limited downside protected by financial strength and market leadership, and significant upside driven by cyclical recovery and military growth optionality. The key variables to monitor are inventory normalization timing and military contract wins. If both align as management expects, the stock's current valuation will likely prove to be a cyclical trough rather than a new normal.