New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP)

Executive Summary / Key Takeaways

• Pre-Production Value Creation: New Pacific Metals controls two of the world's largest undeveloped primary silver deposits with combined potential of nearly 19 million ounces annually, yet trades at a fraction of the estimated net present value per share ($16.37–$20.35 for Silver Sand alone versus current price around $3.48), representing a rare pure-play leverage to structural silver market deficits.

• Financial Discipline with Strategic Backing: Despite zero revenue and ongoing losses, the company maintains a fortress balance sheet with C$40.42 million in fresh equity from strategic investors Silvercorp (28.87% stake) and Pan American Silver (13% stake), providing substantial runway at current burn rates while management defers high-cost activities until permits are secured.

• Silver Market Inflection Point: The 184-million-ounce annual silver deficit (15% of global demand) driven by AI and green energy applications, combined with Bolivia's underexplored potential, positions NEWP at the intersection of supply scarcity and geographic opportunity, with its open-pit amenable assets offering industry-leading all-in sustaining costs below $11 per ounce.

• Execution Hinges on Permitting: The entire investment thesis rests on converting exploration licenses to administrative mining contracts under Bolivia's 2014 Mining Code; success unlocks a path to production and potential re-rating, while delays risk dilutive financings and value erosion in a capital-intensive industry.

• Valuation Disconnect: With a market capitalization under $640 million against combined project NPVs approaching $2 billion at current silver prices, NEWP trades at a significant discount to intrinsic value, though this reflects legitimate jurisdictional risk and the long timeline to first production.

Setting the Scene: A Pre-Production Silver Giant in Bolivia

New Pacific Metals Corp., incorporated in 2007 as Tagish Lake Gold Corp and headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, represents a pure-play bet on the structural supply deficit in the global silver market. The company abandoned its original gold focus in 2016, rebranding to reflect its core business: exploration and development of silver-dominant polymetallic deposits in Bolivia's underexplored Potosí Department. This strategic pivot explains its current positioning—NEWP is not a mining company but a resource development firm sitting on what could become one of the world's largest primary silver operations.

The silver market structure reveals why this matters. In 2023, the market recorded a 184-million-ounce deficit representing 15% of global demand, the fourth consecutive year of shortfall. Industrial demand jumped 11% to a record 20,353 tonnes, driven by AI infrastructure, electric vehicles, and solar panels, with the solar industry alone projected to require 273 million ounces annually by 2030. Yet supply response remains anemic; most silver production comes as a byproduct of base metal mining, and pure silver discoveries have been scarce. Bolivia, despite hosting the legendary Cerro Rico silver mountain, has been starved of foreign investment due to political instability and regulatory uncertainty. NEWP's 100% ownership of the Silver Sand property and control of the Carangas project place it at the nexus of supply scarcity and geographic opportunity.

The competitive landscape underscores NEWP's unique position. While peers like Santacruz Silver Mining and Andean Precious Metals operate processing plants and generate revenue, they lack NEWP's scale of primary silver resources. Junior explorers Eloro Resources and Silver Elephant Mining hold Bolivian assets but trail NEWP in development maturity. NEWP's Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for Silver Sand, completed in June 2024, and Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for Carangas, published in late 2024, provide engineering credibility that most exploration-stage peers cannot match. This creates a differentiated risk/reward profile: higher execution risk than producers, but greater resource leverage than explorers.

Technology, Assets, and Strategic Differentiation

New Pacific's "technology" is geological and engineering rather than digital, but the differentiation is equally compelling. The Silver Sand project covers 5.42 square kilometers of sediment-hosted silver-lead-zinc mineralization amenable to low-cost open-pit mining. The PFS outlines a 13-year mine life producing 12 million ounces of silver annually at an all-in sustaining cost (AISC) of $10.69 per ounce, with early years potentially reaching 15 million ounces. At a $24 per ounce silver price, the post-tax NPV5% reaches $740 million with a 37% internal rate of return. These metrics place Silver Sand among the most attractive undeveloped silver projects globally.

The Carangas project adds another layer of optionality. The PEA indicates potential for 6.6 million ounces of annual silver production plus over 1 million ounces of gold at depth, with an after-tax NPV of $501 million (5% discount) and an AISC of just $7.60 per ounce net of by-products. Combined, the two projects approach 19 million ounces of annual silver production, which would rank NEWP just below Pan American Silver in global silver production tables. This scale matters because it positions the company as a potential acquisition target or future mid-tier producer in a market where primary silver assets are increasingly scarce.

Management's disciplined approach to capital allocation represents a strategic moat. CEO Andrew Williams explicitly states the company will secure permits before undertaking significant engineering or exploration work. This contrasts sharply with peers who burn capital on aggressive drilling campaigns while permitting lags. By deferring a 20,000-meter drill program and feasibility study expenditures until regulatory clarity emerges, NEWP preserves optionality and maintains a modest cash burn rate. This financial conservatism, born from operating in Bolivia's challenging jurisdiction, becomes a competitive advantage when silver prices are volatile and capital is expensive.

The recent cessation of illegal mining activities at Silver Sand, effective July 1, 2025, following a constitutional amparo granted June 25, provides immediate and long-term protection against resource theft and community conflict. This removes a significant operational risk that had plagued the project and demonstrates the company's ability to navigate Bolivia's legal system effectively. For investors, this validates management's emphasis on securing legal certainty before committing capital.

Financial Performance: Capital Preservation as Strategy

New Pacific's financial statements tell a story of intentional pre-production investment rather than operational failure. Zero revenue from 2019 through 2025 is expected for an exploration company; the absence of sales is not a red flag but a stage-appropriate characteristic. What matters is how the company manages its capital while advancing projects toward production.

The trend in operating expenses reveals improving cost discipline. For the three months ended September 30, 2025, operating expenses fell to $1.32 million from $1.61 million in the prior year period, while the net loss attributable to equity holders narrowed to $0.75 million from $1.26 million.

Liquidity provides the foundation for this strategy. As of September 30, 2025, working capital stood at $14.88 million. The October 2025 bought deal financing, which closed at C$40.42 million (US$28.8 million) through the sale of 11,385,000 shares at C$3.55, significantly strengthens this position. With approximately $46.8 million in cash (combining the December 2024 cash position with the October 2025 financing proceeds) and a quarterly net loss of $0.75 million, the company has over 15 years of runway, significantly reducing near-term dilution risk.

The shelf prospectus filed in October 2025, replacing the expired August 2023 document, provides future financing flexibility without immediate dilution. This is critical because the Silver Sand project alone requires $358 million in initial capital costs to reach production. The company's ability to raise capital on favorable terms, with strategic investors validating the valuation, suggests that future dilution risks are manageable if permitting progresses as planned.

Exploration expenditures totaled just $0.35 million between Q2 and Q3 2025, reflecting management's decision to limit high-cost activities pending permit progress. This cost control is crucial when every dollar spent reduces runway to first production.

Outlook and Execution Path

Management's 2025 priorities reveal a clear strategic sequence: secure permits for Silver Sand and Carangas, maintain financial strength, then commit capital to construction. This disciplined approach, applied successfully in 2024, has preserved approximately $18 million in cash while advancing technical studies. The goal is to convert Carangas' Exploration License into an Administrative Mining Contract under Bolivia's 2014 Mining Code—a process that requires navigating complex regulatory and community engagement requirements.

The timeline to production remains uncertain, which is both a risk and an opportunity. While peers like Santacruz Silver Mining and Andean Precious Metals generate cash flow from existing operations, they lack NEWP's production growth potential. The company's forecast annual earnings decline of 20.8% over the next three years reflects continued exploration spending with no revenue, but this projection assumes no production start. Should permitting accelerate faster than expected, the earnings inflection could be dramatic and earlier than modeled.

Silver price leverage is embedded in the asset economics. The Silver Sand PFS assumes $24 per ounce silver, yet prices have traded higher, with the market in structural deficit. Every dollar increase in the silver price adds approximately $30 million to Silver Sand's NPV. At current prices above $30 per ounce, the combined NPV of both projects approaches $2 billion, nearly four times the current market capitalization. This asymmetry—limited downside with fixed costs and substantial upside to metal prices—defines the speculative appeal.

Risks and Asymmetries: What Can Break the Thesis

The most material risk is Bolivia's regulatory environment. While the amparo victory against illegal mining demonstrates legal progress, converting exploration licenses to mining contracts remains a discretionary process subject to political shifts. Operating in Bolivia presents specific challenges around permitting timelines and community agreements. If the Carangas AMC conversion stalls beyond 2025, the company faces a choice between burning cash on overhead or diluting shareholders to extend runway, all while silver prices could reverse.

Execution risk intensifies as projects approach development. NEWP has no history of building or operating mines. While management's discipline is commendable, the $358 million capital requirement for Silver Sand will likely require project-level debt or streaming agreements that could constrain future cash flows. Any cost overruns or delays during construction would magnify these constraints. Peers like Santacruz Silver Mining , with operational experience in Bolivia, face lower execution risk despite smaller resource bases.

The company's forecast Return on Equity of -1.85% for 2026 reflects continued losses, but this metric becomes irrelevant if the company successfully transitions to production. More concerning is the projected earnings decline of 20.8% annually over three years, which assumes no revenue inflection. If permitting takes longer than expected or silver prices fall below $20 per ounce, the company may be forced into successive equity raises at depressed valuations, permanently impairing per-share value.

Dilution risk is real despite strategic backing. The October 2025 financing increased shares outstanding by approximately 6.2%, and future development capital will require additional funding. While Silvercorp and Pan American Silver 's involvement validates the asset, their ownership stakes also limit potential acquirers. If NEWP cannot secure project financing on reasonable terms, it may become a perpetual explorer rather than a developer, destroying value for minority shareholders.

Competitive Context and Positioning

New Pacific's competitive position is best understood through direct comparison. Eloro Resources holds the Iska Iska polymetallic project in southern Bolivia with high-grade silver-tin intercepts, but lacks a completed PFS and trails NEWP in development readiness. While Eloro Resources 's recent drill results (294 g/t silver over 72 meters) are impressive, its funding independence creates capital constraints that strategic backing shields NEWP from. Financially, both show similar losses, but NEWP's working capital advantage supports longer runway without dilution.

Santacruz Silver Mining operates producing mines in Mexico and Bolivia, generating $79.99 million in Q3 2025 revenue with positive net income of $16.34 million. This production base provides cash flow stability NEWP lacks, but Santacruz Silver Mining 's resource scale pales in comparison. Santacruz Silver Mining 's Soracaya project in Potosí is advancing toward production, creating competitive pressure on timelines, but its smaller resource base limits ultimate production potential. NEWP trades execution risk for resource upside.

Andean Precious Metals represents the processing-centric model, generating record Q3 2025 revenue of $90.4 million with strong margins by toll-milling third-party ore. This provides revenue stability but caps upside; Andean Precious Metals 's growth is volume-dependent while NEWP's is price-leveraged. Andean Precious Metals 's established infrastructure reduces capex needs but creates dependency on external feed sources. NEWP's integrated mining model, once developed, offers superior margins and control.

Silver Elephant Mining is the closest peer in terms of development stage, advancing the Pulacayo-Paca silver-lead-zinc project near NEWP's assets. However, Silver Elephant Mining 's market cap of approximately $14 million and limited cash reflect funding challenges that NEWP's strategic investors mitigate. Both show comparable quarterly losses, but NEWP's resource scale and PFS completion create a clear leadership position among Bolivian silver developers.

The broader competitive dynamic favors NEWP's pure silver focus. As CEO Andrew Williams notes, most silver producers are shifting to gold or base metals due to scarce primary silver resources, making NEWP's 19-million-ounce potential a rare asset. Recent M&A activity in the sector has set "staggering valuation benchmarks" for operating mines, suggesting that successful development could command significant premiums. The company's positioning just below Pan American Silver in potential production scale creates a natural acquisition profile for larger producers seeking to replace depleting reserves.

Valuation Context

At $3.48 per share, New Pacific Metals trades at a market capitalization of approximately $639 million, a modest valuation for a company controlling nearly $2 billion of project NPV at current silver prices. Analysts project Silver Sand's NPV per share at $16.37–$20.35 and Carangas at $10.43–$12.90, implying a combined asset value of $26.80–$33.25 per share against the current $3.48 price. This 7-9x discount reflects the high-risk, pre-production nature of the assets and Bolivia's jurisdictional discount.

Traditional metrics like P/E and P/B are meaningless for a pre-revenue explorer; the company reports negative earnings and trades at 4.48 times book value, but book value largely comprises undeveloped mineral properties whose worth is not captured by accounting rules. More relevant is the enterprise value of $623 million relative to the combined project NPVs, suggesting the market assigns only a 30% probability of successful development.

With approximately $46.8 million in cash (combining the December 2024 cash position with the October 2025 financing proceeds) and a quarterly net loss of $0.75 million, the company has over 15 years of runway, significantly reducing near-term dilution risk. However, the $358 million capital requirement for Silver Sand means the company must ultimately secure project-level financing or strategic partnerships. The presence of Silvercorp and Pan American Silver as major shareholders increases the likelihood of favorable terms, as they have strategic incentives to see the projects developed.

Peer valuation comparisons are challenging given the lack of direct comparables. Producers like Santacruz Silver Mining (SCZ) trade at 16x earnings with 2% revenue growth, reflecting mature operations. Junior explorers Eloro Resources (ELO) and Silver Elephant Mining (SILE) trade at negative earnings with minimal liquidity, while Andean Precious Metals (APM)'s valuation reflects its processing-centric model and scale. NEWP's valuation premium to these juniors is justified by its advanced technical studies and strategic backing, while its discount to producers reflects execution risk.

Conclusion

New Pacific Metals represents a binary investment proposition anchored by geological scale and market timing. The company controls two of the world's largest undeveloped primary silver deposits with combined potential of 19 million ounces annually, positioned to benefit from a structural silver supply deficit driven by AI and green energy demand. Strategic investments from Silvercorp (SVM) and Pan American Silver (PAAS) validate the asset quality while providing financial stability, and management's disciplined capital approach preserves optionality in a volatile metal price environment.

The central thesis hinges on three variables: successful permitting in Bolivia, silver price sustainability above $24 per ounce, and execution of the $358 million Silver Sand development. The amparo victory against illegal mining and recent regulatory improvements in Bolivia suggest jurisdictional risk is moderating, but the conversion of exploration licenses to mining contracts remains the critical path item. With substantial runway and a shelf prospectus in place, the company has the financial flexibility to navigate permitting delays, but any acceleration could unlock significant value.

Trading at a fraction of estimated net present value, NEWP offers asymmetric upside for investors willing to accept pre-production risk. The stock's 62.9% outperformance over the past year reflects growing recognition of this potential, yet the valuation gap to intrinsic value remains substantial.

For long-term investors, the question is not whether the silver market needs new primary supply—it clearly does—but whether New Pacific Metals can deliver its projects on time and on budget. The strategic backing, financial discipline, and geological quality suggest the odds favor success, but the execution phase ahead will determine whether this pre-production story becomes a mid-tier producer reality.