3D Site Mapping
•38 stocks
•
Total Market Cap: Loading...
Price Performance Heatmap
5Y Price (Market Cap Weighted)
All Stocks (38)
| Company | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|
|
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
FARO acquisition supports 3D measurement and site mapping capabilities, aligning with 3D Site Mapping.
|
$46.68B |
$202.14
+1.93%
|
|
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
Matterport's 3D digital twin site-mapping capabilities are directly leveraged across CoStar's platforms.
|
$29.15B |
$68.82
-1.18%
|
|
TRMB
Trimble Inc.
3D site mapping capabilities for surveying and planning are key products in Trimble's portfolio.
|
$19.03B |
$79.77
+1.14%
|
|
BSY
Bentley Systems, Incorporated
3D site mapping is a key visualization capability enabled by acquisitions like Cesium and the iTwin ecosystem.
|
$15.42B |
$50.80
+0.93%
|
|
NXT
Nextracker Inc.
3D Site Mapping for project planning and monitoring
|
$14.98B |
$101.26
+2.16%
|
|
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
Photoneo acquisition strengthens Zebra's 3D machine vision capabilities and related 3D imaging workflows.
|
$13.69B |
$269.10
+2.96%
|
|
PCOR
Procore Technologies, Inc.
Novorender BIM rendering capabilities imply 3D site mapping/visualization within the construction platform.
|
$11.01B |
$73.86
+2.58%
|
|
SPXC
SPX Technologies, Inc.
3D site mapping capabilities cross into SPXC's project planning and solar initiatives within D&M.
|
$10.47B |
$223.90
+12.60%
|
|
TTEK
Tetra Tech, Inc.
3D Site Mapping is used for planning and monitoring projects, including large-scale infrastructure.
|
$8.43B |
$31.98
-0.61%
|
|
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
3D site mapping supports solar installations and project design, aligning with Sunrun's design tools.
|
$4.74B |
$20.77
+5.86%
|
|
OII
Oceaneering International, Inc.
3D Site Mapping is used for planning and inspecting subsea assets, aligning with Oceaneering's mapping and surveying capabilities.
|
$2.33B |
$23.29
+1.11%
|
|
QMMM
QMMM Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
3D site mapping and related 3D scanning capabilities are part of the immersive tech stack.
|
$2.04B |
$119.40
|
|
ROCK
Gibraltar Industries, Inc.
Uses 3D site mapping for planning and optimizing solar installation projects.
|
$1.84B |
$62.43
-2.51%
|
|
NVEE
NV5 Global, Inc.
3D Site Mapping is a service NV5 provides for projects like solar deployments and asset assessment.
|
$1.48B |
$22.56
|
|
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
3D site mapping capabilities tied to drone platforms (mapping and surveying applications).
|
$963.54M |
$11.24
+6.49%
|
|
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
Explicit 3D site mapping capabilities used for planning and design, reflecting a major service line.
|
$746.02M |
$43.27
|
|
GNE
Genie Energy Ltd.
3D Site Mapping: Used in planning and monitoring solar installations.
|
$404.03M |
$15.07
+2.24%
|
|
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc.
3D site mapping capability via lidar sensing for industrial applications.
|
$291.64M |
$1.17
+2.19%
|
|
PXPC
Phoenix Plus Corp.
Company may use 3D site mapping in planning and deployment of solar installations.
|
$286.22M |
$4.20
|
|
CMCM
Cheetah Mobile Inc.
3D Site Mapping corresponds to AI-driven 3D mapping capabilities used for factory navigation and robotics deployment.
|
$222.33M |
$7.54
-2.77%
|
|
RCMT
RCM Technologies, Inc.
RCMT utilizes 3D site mapping in planning and execution of complex engineering projects.
|
$170.72M |
$23.05
-0.97%
|
|
USGO
U.S. GoldMining Inc.
3D site mapping and detailed exploration targeting referenced in project advancement.
|
$144.48M |
$11.52
-1.12%
|
|
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The company pursues ship hull scanning and subsea mapping applications leveraging its 3D sonar imaging technology.
|
$115.13M |
$10.21
+1.54%
|
|
SPAI
Safe Pro Group Inc. Common Stock
3D Site Mapping used for planning and monitoring demining/infrastructure surveys.
|
$95.58M |
$6.29
+3.20%
|
|
MIND
MIND Technology, Inc.
3D Site Mapping capabilities align with MIND's hydrographic surveying and marine data acquisition use cases.
|
$87.74M |
$11.00
+4.07%
|
|
ZENA
ZenaTech, Inc.
3D site mapping capabilities are a core service for surveying and solar installations.
|
$80.14M |
$4.62
+6.32%
|
|
FLCX
flooidCX Corp.
3D site mapping and surveying support planning and monitoring of solar installations.
|
$74.49M |
$0.00
|
|
VATE
INNOVATE Corp.
DBM Global/Infrastructure capabilities include 3D site mapping for planning and monitoring projects.
|
$72.00M |
$5.37
+1.70%
|
|
OMEX
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.
3D site mapping capability used for planning and monitoring deep-sea exploration projects.
|
$66.74M |
$2.12
-7.21%
|
|
SUUN
PowerBank Corporation
Company uses 3D site mapping and surveying to plan and monitor solar installations.
|
$56.39M |
$1.59
-1.54%
|
|
DPRO
Draganfly Inc.
The Commander 3XL and other platforms enable 3D site mapping and complex geospatial missions.
|
$41.89M |
$10.95
+11.57%
|
|
VRAR
The Glimpse Group, Inc.
3D site mapping capabilities align with Spatial Core's 3D data workflows.
|
$33.27M |
$1.59
+2.58%
|
|
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.
3D site mapping is highlighted as a key capability enabled by their UAS and sensors.
|
$26.60M |
$1.91
+2.42%
|
|
NXPL
NextPlat Corp
3D site mapping technology is used to plan and monitor solar installations as part of NXPL's solar projects.
|
$23.37M |
$0.88
-10.71%
|
|
HCAI
Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
3D site mapping concepts for planning and deploying parking infrastructure fit 3D Site Mapping.
|
$16.77M |
$0.57
-0.17%
|
|
CXAI
CXApp Inc.
3D Site Mapping is a core capability for spatial intelligence within CXAI's platform.
|
$15.08M |
$0.73
+7.32%
|
|
ARBB
ARB IOT Group Limited
The company demonstrates 3D site mapping capabilities through its AI plantation mapping system integrated with drones.
|
$10.84M |
$6.37
-11.35%
|
|
FRSX
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd.
3D site mapping capability derived from FRSX's 3D perception stack used for obstacle detection and terrain analysis.
|
$4.96M |
$2.30
+2.22%
|
Loading company comparison...
Loading industry trends...
# Executive Summary
The 3D Site Mapping industry is undergoing a rapid transformation driven by the integration of AI and the adoption of digital twin technology, shifting business models from one-off services to recurring software revenue. Despite strong technological tailwinds, the industry faces near-term demand pressure from macroeconomic headwinds and higher interest rates, which are delaying capital projects in core end markets like construction and real estate. The competitive landscape is highly dynamic, characterized by aggressive M&A as companies consolidate to acquire new technologies, build scale, and gain market share. Financial performance is bifurcated: software-pure-plays exhibit high margins, while integrated hardware and tech-enabled services firms show faster revenue growth but lower gross margins. Key players are differentiating through distinct strategies, including dominant hardware/software integration, pure-play digital twin platforms, and M&A-fueled service consolidation. Capital allocation is focused on strategic M&A and technology investments, with established leaders also returning significant capital to shareholders via buybacks.
## Key Trends & Outlook
The most significant force shaping the 3D Site Mapping industry is the rapid advancement and integration of artificial intelligence and digital twin technology. This technological shift is enabling the transformation of physical assets into interactive, data-rich digital models. This matters for valuations because it allows companies to move away from cyclical, project-based work toward more predictable, high-margin recurring revenue streams from SaaS platforms and data analytics. Leaders like Bentley Systems (BSY) with its iTwin platform and CoStar Group (CSGP) through its Matterport integration are leveraging this to deepen their competitive moats. The impact is happening now, with firms like NV5 Global (NVEE) seeing approximately 20% organic growth in these advanced digital solutions.
While the long-term technology trend is strong, near-term demand is being tempered by macroeconomic headwinds, particularly higher interest rates. This directly impacts client capital budgets, leading to project delays in key markets like commercial real estate and construction. Companies with higher recurring revenue, such as Bentley Systems (BSY) at 92%, are better insulated than those more exposed to new project starts.
The largest opportunity lies in expanding the use of digital twins from design and construction into the full lifecycle of an asset, creating long-term operational and maintenance revenue streams. The primary risk is a prolonged economic downturn that significantly curtails new construction and infrastructure spending, alongside intense competition from the ongoing wave of M&A, as demonstrated by consolidators like Bowman Consulting (BWMN).
## Competitive Landscape
The 3D Site Mapping market is composed of several distinct strategic approaches, noting that while some segments are highly concentrated, with Trimble (TRMB) holding an estimated 89-90% market share in geospatial/construction tools, the broader industry remains competitive.
Some established players leverage a dominant position in hardware to create an integrated software ecosystem. Trimble (TRMB) exemplifies this with its "Connect & Scale" strategy, built on digitally connecting workflows from its dominant hardware base, and is actively managing the transition by increasing its recurring revenue mix to 60%. This model benefits from enormous market share and high switching costs, but its margins can be impacted by hardware costs.
In contrast, other firms focus on a pure-play software model, targeting specific verticals like infrastructure with high-margin digital twin platforms. Bentley Systems (BSY) embodies this approach, with its focus on infrastructure engineering software, the iTwin platform at its core, and 92% recurring revenue. This strategy yields extremely high gross margins, often above 80%, and predictable recurring revenue. A third approach involves the rapid consolidation of traditional professional services firms, using technology as a scaler and margin driver. Bowman Consulting (BWMN) demonstrates this with over 35 acquisitions since its 2021 IPO, combined with the creation of its "BIG Fund" to scale technology internally. This asset-light model allows for rapid revenue growth through acquisitions and deep client relationships.
The key competitive battlegrounds in the industry include the race to build out comprehensive digital twin platforms, the ongoing shift to recurring revenue models, and strategic M&A to acquire talent and technology.
## Financial Performance
Revenue growth in the 3D Site Mapping industry is robust but divergent, ranging from +3% organic to +42% year-over-year. This wide growth range is driven by different business models and end-market exposures. The highest growth is seen in companies like Nextracker (NXT), which are integrating 3D mapping into adjacent, booming sectors like utility-scale solar, achieving +42% YoY revenue growth in Q2 FY26. In contrast, mature market leaders like Trimble (TRMB) are posting more modest, single-digit organic growth of +3% in Q1-25 as they focus on transitioning their massive customer base to recurring revenue models.
{{chart_0}}
Profitability profiles are clearly clustered by business model, with gross margins ranging from approximately 33% to over 82%. The significant divergence in profitability is a direct result of companies' core offerings. Software-pure-play firms that sell high-value digital twin and engineering platforms, like Bentley Systems (BSY), command premium gross margins above 80%, reporting 82.3% in Q1-25. Companies with a significant hardware or physical component, such as Nextracker (NXT), operate at much lower gross margins, around 33% in Q1 FY26, but compensate with high revenue volume and strong adjusted EBITDA margins of 25%.
{{chart_1}}
Capital allocation strategies reflect each company's strategic priority, showing a clear split between aggressive investment for growth and capital returns from mature leaders. Growth-focused players are deploying capital aggressively toward M&A to acquire technology and market share. Nextracker (NXT) and Bowman Consulting (BWMN) exemplify this with their numerous recent acquisitions, including Nextracker's acquisition of Origami Solar for approximately $53 million and Bowman's over 35 acquisitions since its IPO. In contrast, established, highly profitable incumbents like Trimble (TRMB) are generating enough cash to both invest in R&D and return significant capital to shareholders, as shown by its $627.4 million in Q1 2025 share repurchases.
The industry's balance sheets are generally strong and well-capitalized across the board. This financial strength provides the flexibility to fund both organic technology investments and strategic M&A. Nextracker (NXT) represents a pristine example with over $743 million in cash and no debt as of Q2 FY26, giving it a "fortress balance sheet" to pursue its growth strategy.