Color Cosmetics
•20 stocks
•
Total Market Cap: Loading...
Price Performance Heatmap
5Y Price (Market Cap Weighted)
All Stocks (20)
| Company | Market Cap | Price |
|---|---|---|
|
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
PG's color cosmetics offerings are captured by Color Cosmetics.
|
$353.51B |
$150.93
+1.85%
|
|
CVS
CVS Health Corporation
Color cosmetics are part of CVS’s beauty assortment in stores.
|
$98.97B |
$78.05
+0.02%
|
|
EL
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Color cosmetics (makeup) is a key product line of the company.
|
$32.35B |
$89.88
+3.78%
|
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
Color cosmetics are a core product category offered by Ulta.
|
$23.17B |
$515.67
+3.87%
|
|
DLTR
Dollar Tree, Inc.
Color cosmetics are included in the beauty category.
|
$21.25B |
$101.83
+0.01%
|
|
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Color Cosmetics – Walgreens retails cosmetics and makeup products.
|
$10.36B |
$11.98
|
|
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
Core product category: color cosmetics (lip, eye, face makeup) sold under ELF brands.
|
$3.97B |
$70.02
+2.34%
|
|
VSCO
Victoria's Secret & Co.
Color cosmetics (makeup) are part of VSCO's beauty line.
|
$2.93B |
$36.71
+0.03%
|
|
COTY
Coty Inc.
Coty directly manufactures and markets color cosmetics under multiple brands (e.g., CoverGirl, Rimmel, Kylie Cosmetics).
|
$2.76B |
$3.15
+1.12%
|
|
ODD
Oddity Tech Ltd.
IL MAKIAGE focuses on color cosmetics.
|
$2.17B |
$37.72
-4.68%
|
|
KSS
Kohl's Corporation
Color cosmetics are a major beauty subcategory.
|
$1.76B |
$15.70
-0.06%
|
|
YSG
Yatsen Holding Limited
Directly produced color cosmetics (makeup) under Perfect Diary, a core brand in Yatsen's portfolio.
|
$625.84M |
$6.35
|
|
HELE
Helen of Troy Limited
Color cosmetics are part of the beauty product lineup in the portfolio.
|
$423.53M |
$18.41
-0.19%
|
|
WALD
Waldencast plc
Milk Makeup is a color cosmetics brand producing makeup products (e.g., Hydro Grip Gel Skin Tint).
|
$377.31M |
$3.06
-0.49%
|
|
PTNM
Pitanium Limited
Product lineup includes color cosmetics/makeup.
|
$236.37M |
$10.39
|
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc. Common Stock
Revenue from color cosmetics represents a major consumer products line within the business.
|
$155.77M |
$2.22
+7.77%
|
|
NXGL
NEXGEL, Inc.
Cosmetics-focused products (lip gloss, color cosmetics) from the Silly George brand.
|
$13.15M |
$1.65
+0.92%
|
|
YJ
Yunji Inc.
Cosmetics products (color cosmetics) are part of the company’s beauty SKUs.
|
$8.56M |
$1.58
-1.25%
|
|
FEBO
Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
Nail polish is a color cosmetic product, a sub-category within personal care.
|
$8.14M |
$0.76
+3.32%
|
|
HIGR
Hi-Great Group Holding Company
Strategic plan to expand into Color Cosmetics leveraging herbal oils/components.
|
$4.10M |
$0.04
|
Loading company comparison...
Loading industry trends...
# Executive Summary
* The color cosmetics industry is navigating significant macroeconomic volatility, with shifting consumer spending habits pressuring premium brands and favoring those with strong value propositions.
* Competitive intensity has reached a peak, leading to market share shifts as digitally native brands and new distribution channels challenge established leaders.
* In response, leading firms are aggressively integrating AI and digital technologies, which is becoming the primary differentiator for driving marketing efficiency and personalizing consumer engagement.
* Profitability is under pressure from both macroeconomic headwinds and direct cost impacts from tariffs and supply chain issues, forcing operational adjustments.
* Strategic capital allocation is diverging, with disruptors investing in M&A and technology while some incumbents focus on restructuring and debt reduction.
* The long-term outlook favors companies that can blend technological innovation with an authentic response to consumer demands for value, efficacy, and ethical production.
## Key Trends & Outlook
The color cosmetics industry in late 2025 is being reshaped by significant macroeconomic volatility and a resulting shift in consumer spending. Subdued consumer sentiment and inflationary pressures are forcing a re-evaluation of discretionary purchases, a headwind explicitly cited by major players like The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). This directly impacts valuations by threatening revenue growth for premium brands and compressing margins as companies increase promotions to capture value-conscious consumers. This environment creates a clear divergence, benefiting brands with accessible value propositions while forcing prestige players to defend their market position. The impact is immediate, reflected in cautious corporate outlooks and revised financial guidance for the coming 6-12 months.
This macroeconomic pressure is amplified by a hyper-competitive and fragmented market. The proliferation of indie, celebrity, and digital-first brands across a growing number of distribution channels is eroding the moats of traditional leaders. This dynamic has led to tangible market share losses for major retailers like Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA), which noted a decline in 2024 due to the intensified competitive environment. Survival now depends on a company's ability to rapidly innovate and differentiate.
The primary opportunity lies in leveraging AI and digital transformation to gain a competitive edge. Companies like Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) are proving that investing in AI-driven personalization and marketing can yield significant, quantifiable returns and build a direct relationship with the consumer. The most acute risk to profitability is margin compression stemming from the combination of consumer trade-down, promotional pressure, and direct cost headwinds from potential tariffs on China-sourced goods.
## Competitive Landscape
The color cosmetics market is highly fragmented and intensely competitive, with no single player dominating. This environment is characterized by significant pressure from both multinational conglomerates and a continuous influx of smaller, agile brands.
Some newer players are succeeding with an AI-powered, direct-to-consumer model that builds a direct data link to the customer. This strategy bypasses traditional retail by using a proprietary AI and data science platform to acquire customers online, personalize product recommendations, and drive high-margin e-commerce sales. A key advantage of this approach is high gross margins, direct control over the consumer relationship and data, and rapid product development based on real-time insights. However, vulnerabilities include high customer acquisition costs and reliance on the performance of digital marketing channels. Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) exemplifies this model, with its use of the AI-driven PowerMatch platform to achieve high online conversion for its IL MAKIAGE brand.
In contrast, another successful approach involves capturing the mass market with a strong value proposition and agile, digital marketing. This strategy competes by offering on-trend, prestige-inspired products at accessible mass-market price points, amplified by a digitally-savvy marketing engine that builds a loyal community. Advantages include a large addressable market and resilience during economic downturns due to its value proposition. Lower pricing power and exposure to tariff headwinds due to mass production in regions like China are key vulnerabilities. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) perfectly demonstrates this strategy, with an average product price of approximately $6.50 and its status as the number one mass brand by unit share in the U.S..
Traditional prestige portfolio holders, such as The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL), are defending their position by leveraging brand equity while adapting their distribution and technology to compete in the new environment. This core strategy involves leveraging a portfolio of established, high-end brands with strong brand equity, distributed through a mix of traditional prestige retail and expanding digital channels. Strong brand loyalty, pricing power, and global distribution scale are key advantages. However, these companies are vulnerable to macroeconomic shifts in discretionary spending and can be slower to adapt to fast-moving trends. The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.'s portfolio of iconic brands and its ongoing transformation plan, including expansion into new channels like Amazon Premium Beauty, showcase this model's characteristics and evolution.
## Financial Performance
Revenue growth in the color cosmetics industry is sharply divided between tech-forward disruptors and incumbents facing headwinds. Digitally-native companies like Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) are thriving, exemplified by its +25% year-over-year revenue growth in Q2 2025. This success highlights the efficacy of business models built to capitalize on current market dynamics. In contrast, larger players undergoing transformation or facing market moderation, such as Coty Inc. (COTY), experienced a -2% year-over-year net revenue decline in fiscal year 2025, reflecting the challenges faced by some incumbents.
{{chart_0}}
Profitability shows a clear divergence based on business model and operational pressures. Gross margins structurally vary, ranging from the high 70s and low 80s for brand owners like Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) at 78.3% in Q2 2025, to approximately 39.1% for retailers such as Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) in Q1 FY25. Operating margins are the key battleground, currently being squeezed by macroeconomic factors and tariffs. Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) showcases the high profitability of an asset-light, AI-driven model, reporting $122 million in Adjusted EBITDA for H1 2025. Conversely, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) reported a 4.9% operating margin in Q1 FY26, reflecting the cost pressures and investments required during its strategic transformation.
{{chart_1}}
Capital allocation strategies reflect each company's competitive position, showing a clear split between investing for growth and restructuring for stability. Disruptors are deploying capital to consolidate their lead through strategic M&A and technology investment. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.'s (ELF) proposed acquisition of rhode for up to $1 billion is a prime example of aggressive investment for growth. In contrast, some large incumbents are focused on deleveraging and returning capital to shareholders as they streamline operations. Coty Inc. (COTY) has notably reduced its net debt by over $4 billion since 2021, targeting further reductions to approximately 2 times exiting calendar 2025.
{{chart_2}}
The health of company balance sheets is mixed, directly reflecting their business model's cash-generating ability and past capital strategies. Asset-light, high-margin digital players have built robust, cash-rich balance sheets, providing them with significant strategic flexibility. Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) exemplifies this with $815 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments as of Q2 2025, alongside minimal debt. Other firms, such as Coty Inc. (COTY), which have used debt to finance past acquisitions, are now prioritizing deleveraging to regain financial flexibility.