Menu

The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL)

$18.79
-0.20 (-1.08%)
Get curated updates for this stock by email. We filter for the most important fundamentals-focused developments and send only the key news to your inbox.

Data provided by IEX. Delayed 15 minutes.

Market Cap

$1.9B

Enterprise Value

$2.0B

P/E Ratio

13.0

Div Yield

0.00%

Rev Growth YoY

+9.0%

Rev 3Y CAGR

+7.5%

Earnings YoY

-25.6%

Earnings 3Y CAGR

-1.5%

Portfolio Transformation at The Simply Good Foods: Quest's Rise and Atkins' Rationalization (NASDAQ:SMPL)

Executive Summary / Key Takeaways

  • The Simply Good Foods Company is executing a deliberate portfolio transformation, sacrificing near-term growth to reposition Quest and OWYN as its primary growth engines while strategically rationalizing the declining Atkins brand, creating a "tale of two halves" in fiscal 2026 that sets up stronger long-term positioning.

  • Quest has emerged as a category disruptor, generating $863.6 million in FY2025 sales (13% growth) and approaching $1 billion in annual revenue, with its salty snacks platform growing 34% and expanding manufacturing capacity for the second time in two years, demonstrating superior contribution margins approximately 10 points higher than Atkins.

  • Atkins faces a structural decline with FY2025 sales down 14.5% and a $60.9 million impairment, but management is proactively rightsizing distribution, repositioning the brand for GLP-1 drug users, and reallocating shelf space to higher-performing Quest and OWYN products rather than fighting a losing battle for legacy relevance.

  • OWYN's plant-based clean label proposition addresses a rapidly accelerating consumer trend, with 34% consumption growth in FY2025 despite a temporary quality issue, low aided awareness of only 20% indicating massive headroom, and management's confidence in doubling sales within three to four years.

  • The investment case hinges on successfully navigating this portfolio transition amid inflationary pressures and tariff headwinds, with FY2026 guidance reflecting a strategic choice to absorb short-term margin compression (down 100-150 basis points) to build sustainable competitive advantages in faster-growing categories.

Setting the Scene: The Nutritious Snacking Platform

The Simply Good Foods Company, founded in March 2017 through the acquisition of the Atkins brand, has evolved into a portfolio-based nutritious snacking platform headquartered in Denver, Colorado. The company operates an asset-light business model, leveraging contract manufacturers to produce protein bars, ready-to-drink shakes, salty snacks, and confections across three distinct brands: Quest, Atkins, and OWYN. This structure provides flexibility for product development and market responsiveness but creates inherent dependencies on external production capacity and input cost volatility.

The company sits at the intersection of a generational shift in consumer eating patterns. Over 70% of Americans actively seek more protein, less sugar, and fewer carbohydrates, driving the nutritional snacking category to grow at high single-digit to low double-digit rates for five consecutive years, reaching 13% growth in fiscal 2025. This structural demand tailwind creates a favorable backdrop, but execution within the portfolio determines relative performance. Simply Good Foods makes money by capturing disproportionate value from this trend through brand-specific positioning: Quest as the macro-disrupting innovation leader, Atkins as the scientifically credible weight management solution, and OWYN as the clean-label plant-based alternative.

The competitive landscape reflects both opportunity and pressure. Large CPG players like Mondelez International (MDLZ) (Clif Bar), Kellanova (K) (RXBAR, Special K), Hormel Foods (HRL) (Muscle Milk), and BellRing Brands (BRBR) (Premier Protein) compete directly for shelf space and consumer attention. These competitors benefit from greater scale, diversified portfolios, and deeper retail relationships. Simply Good Foods' position as a pure-play nutritious snacking company provides focus and agility but limits bargaining power with massive retailers like Walmart (WMT), which represents 31% of consolidated sales, and Amazon (AMZN) at 18%. This concentration creates both volume stability and vulnerability to assortment decisions, as evidenced by Atkins' distribution losses.

History with Purpose: From Atkins to Quest Dominance

The company's origin story explains its current strategic imperative. The 2017 Atkins acquisition provided immediate scale and scientific credibility in low-carb nutrition, establishing a foundation in weight management. However, the 2019 Quest acquisition proved transformative, creating a true growth platform that now generates nearly two-thirds of net sales. Quest's positioning as a category disruptor—flipping the macros on mainstream snacks—resonates with a broader consumer base seeking permissible indulgence rather than strict diet adherence.

The June 2024 OWYN acquisition for $281.9 million, financed with $250 million in incremental borrowings, represents the third leg of the portfolio stool. Management repaid nearly all of this debt within a year, demonstrating disciplined capital allocation and strong cash conversion. OWYN's plant-based, allergen-free proposition captures the clean label movement, but a pre-acquisition pea protein sourcing decision created a temporary quality issue affecting taste and texture. This matters because it highlights both the risks of acquisition integration and the asset-light model's limitations in quality control. The company has since mitigated the issue, but rebuilding consumer trust requires sustained marketing investment that pressures near-term margins.

This historical progression reveals why the Atkins brand faces existential pressure. What began as the company's foundation has become its anchor. Rather than prop up a declining brand, management is making the difficult but necessary choice to rationalize Atkins' distribution footprint, eliminate underperforming SKUs, and repurpose shelf space to Quest and OWYN. The $60.9 million non-cash impairment in Q4 2025 reflects updated revenue projections, but more importantly signals strategic clarity: allocate resources to winners, not losers.

Technology, Products, and Strategic Differentiation

Quest's product architecture drives its competitive advantage. The brand's macro-flipping approach—high protein, low sugar, low net carbs—disrupts conventional snacking categories. The salty snacks platform exemplifies this success, growing from 20% of Quest retail sales three years ago to over $300 million today, with consumption up 34% in FY2025. This performance justifies doubling manufacturing capacity for the second time in two years, a $30-40 million capital investment in FY2026 that reinforces competitive position in the fastest-growing segment.

The innovation pipeline extends beyond salty snacks. Quest Bake Shop's high-protein donuts launching in Q1 FY2026, the Overload bar platform, and ready-to-drink milkshakes with 45 grams of protein demonstrate continuous category expansion. These launches matter because they increase purchase frequency and household penetration, which reached 19% in Q4 2025 (up 170 basis points). Each new platform brings new consumers into the Quest franchise, creating cross-purchase synergies that competitors with narrower portfolios cannot replicate.

OWYN's technology proposition centers on clean label purity—free from the top nine allergens with minimal ingredient lists. Despite aided awareness of only 20% and ACV for shakes in the mid-60s, the brand's ready-to-drink products turn 50% faster than the nearest competitor in MULO channels. This velocity advantage, combined with average distribution of just seven SKUs per store (well below competitors), indicates massive untapped potential. The quality issue temporarily slowed growth, but Q4's double-digit consumption growth and sustained mid-teens momentum in Q1 FY2026 suggest recovery is underway.

Atkins' strategic repositioning reflects technological and messaging evolution. The brand's scientific credibility and 1,600+ recipes provide authentic weight management authority, but its product portfolio requires modernization. New advertising targeting GLP-1 drug users leverages a cultural moment where pharmaceutical weight loss creates demand for complementary nutrition solutions. This positioning could transform Atkins from a declining legacy brand into a niche player serving a specific, high-value consumer segment. The introduction of smaller pack sizes addresses price sensitivity, but the core challenge remains distribution losses, particularly in club and mass channels where Quest and OWYN now take priority.

Financial Performance & Segment Dynamics: Evidence of Strategic Execution

Fiscal 2025 results validate the portfolio transformation narrative. Reported net sales grew 9% to approximately $1.42 billion, with organic growth of 3% reflecting Quest's 13.4% expansion and OWYN's contribution offsetting Atkins' 12.9% decline. This mix shift is economically significant because Quest's contribution margin is approximately 10 points higher than Atkins. Every dollar of sales migrating from Atkins to Quest improves overall profitability, justifying the strategic rationalization despite near-term revenue headwinds.

Loading interactive chart...

Segment performance reveals divergent trajectories. Quest's $863.6 million in FY2025 sales with 12% consumption growth and 19% household penetration demonstrates market share gains in a competitive environment. Salty snacks' 34% growth and 35% of Quest retail sales indicate successful category expansion. Conversely, Atkins' $420.8 million in sales with 10% consumption decline reflects distribution losses at key retailers, particularly Walmart's reduction of Atkins SKUs. The proactive elimination of bottom-quartile SKUs (10-15% of portfolio) and trade program rationalization will disproportionately impact near-term consumption but builds a more profitable, sustainable core.

Gross margin compression tells a similar story. FY2025 gross margin of 36.33% declined 220 basis points, with Q4 dropping 450 basis points to 34.3% (540 bps excluding inventory step-up). This reflects elevated input costs, particularly cocoa contracted at historically high prices, and initial tariff impacts. However, management has secured cocoa coverage for the second half of FY2026 at rates well below prior year levels, creating a clear path to margin recovery. The "U-shape" margin trajectory—Q1 FY2026 around 32.5% before improving to FY2025 levels by Q4—demonstrates proactive cost management rather than structural deterioration.

Loading interactive chart...

Adjusted EBITDA grew 3.4% in FY2025, muted by Atkins' headwinds and OWYN integration costs, but the underlying cash generation remains robust. Operating cash flow of $178.5 million decreased $37.2 million due to working capital timing, but free cash flow conversion remains strong. The balance sheet provides strategic flexibility with net debt to EBITDA of just 0.5x and $171 million remaining on the share repurchase authorization. CFO Christopher Bealer's comment that "low debt levels and high cash conversion rate provides us the optionality to create meaningful long-term value" reflects confidence in the transformation strategy.

Loading interactive chart...

Outlook, Management Guidance, and Execution Risk

Management's FY2026 guidance explicitly acknowledges the portfolio transformation's near-term costs. Net sales growth of negative 2% to positive 2% assumes Quest and OWYN growth offsetting approximately 20% Atkins consumption decline. This represents strategic choice over financial optimization—accepting top-line pressure to accelerate the mix shift toward higher-margin, faster-growing brands. The guidance's "tale of two halves" framework reflects phased execution: Q1 faces the steepest margin compression (nearly 600 basis points) due to elevated inflation, tariff impacts, and OWYN quality issue remediation, while H2 benefits from lower cocoa costs, realized pricing actions, and normalized elasticities.

Gross margin guidance of down 100-150 basis points for the full year masks a more dramatic intra-year trajectory. Q1 margins near 32.5% will pressure EBITDA, expected to decline approximately 25% year-over-year, before recovery in H2 as cost headwinds abate. This U-shape pattern requires investors to look through near-term volatility to the underlying earnings power of a restructured portfolio. The $30-40 million capital expenditure program, focused almost entirely on salty snacks capacity, signals confidence in Quest's growth sustainability and provides tangible evidence of where management sees future returns.

Key execution risks center on three variables. First, Atkins' decline could accelerate beyond the projected 20% if retailer partners further reduce shelf space, particularly in the club channel where Quest expansion may not fully offset losses. Second, OWYN's recovery depends on rebuilding consumer trust after the quality issue, requiring incremental trade and marketing investment that could pressure margins if trial rates don't reaccelerate. Third, inflationary pressures from whey protein and other inputs could persist beyond H1 FY2026, delaying the anticipated margin recovery. Management's proactive cocoa hedging demonstrates supply chain sophistication, but incomplete coverage on other inputs leaves residual risk.

Competitive Context and Positioning

Simply Good Foods' competitive position reflects a series of strategic trade-offs. Against BellRing Brands' Premier Protein, SMPL's diversified portfolio (bars, snacks, shakes) provides broader consumption occasions but lacks the singular focus that has driven BRBR's 16% revenue growth. BRBR's 33.26% gross margin trails SMPL's 36.33%, but its scale in RTD shakes creates volume advantages that pressure SMPL's pricing power in that subcategory. SMPL's advantage lies in Quest's innovation velocity—new platforms like Bake Shop and Overload bars create news and drive trial in ways that BRBR's more limited innovation cannot match.

Versus Hormel's Muscle Milk, SMPL's pure-play positioning enables faster decision-making and more targeted marketing to health-conscious consumers. Hormel's 6.26% net margin reflects diversification into lower-margin protein categories, while SMPL's 7.14% net margin demonstrates superior profitability in the nutritious snacking niche. However, Hormel's supply chain integration provides cost stability that SMPL's contract manufacturer model cannot replicate, as evidenced by the OWYN quality issue and input cost volatility.

Kellanova's RXBAR competes directly with Quest in the clean-label bar space, but SMPL's salty snacks platform has no direct equivalent in K's portfolio. K's 10.08% net margin and 32.11% ROE reflect scale efficiencies, but its 2.28x price-to-sales multiple suggests the market values SMPL's focused growth (1.32x P/S) at a discount despite superior category positioning. Mondelez's Clif Bar maintains broad distribution but faces volume declines (-4.6% in Q3 2025) as consumers shift toward higher-protein, lower-sugar options where SMPL's formulations excel.

SMPL's moats center on brand equity and category innovation. Quest's unaided brand awareness of 15% and household penetration of 19% create switching costs as consumers develop taste preferences and consumption habits. The salty snacks platform's 50% faster velocity than competitors in measured channels demonstrates superior product-market fit. OWYN's clean label leadership, while early-stage, positions the company at the forefront of the accelerating allergen-free trend. These advantages counterbalance scale disadvantages but require continuous investment to maintain.

Valuation Context

Trading at $18.99 per share, Simply Good Foods carries a market capitalization of $1.91 billion and enterprise value of $2.12 billion. The stock trades at 18.6x trailing earnings, a modest premium to Hormel (16.9x) but discount to Kellanova (22.7x) and Mondelez (21.0x). More relevant for a transforming CPG company, the EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.1x sits well below BellRing (13.1x) and the larger peers (K: 15.2x, MDLZ: 16.6x), reflecting market skepticism about the portfolio transition's near-term earnings impact.

Cash flow metrics tell a more compelling story. Price-to-free-cash-flow of 12.3x and price-to-operating-cash-flow of 10.7x imply a free cash flow yield of approximately 8%, attractive relative to both CPG peers and the broader market. This valuation reflects the company's strong cash conversion and low capital intensity, with FY2025 free cash flow of $157.9 million on net income of $103.6 million. The balance sheet's net debt/EBITDA ratio of 0.5x provides substantial flexibility for buybacks, M&A, or increased investment in growth platforms.

The valuation disconnect appears most stark in enterprise value-to-revenue (1.46x) versus growth-adjusted profitability. Quest's 13% growth and OWYN's 34% consumption expansion support a higher multiple than Atkins' drag justifies, but the market applies a portfolio-wide discount. This creates potential upside if management successfully executes the transformation and demonstrates sustained Quest momentum and OWYN scale-up. Conversely, if Atkins' decline accelerates beyond guidance or inflation pressures persist, the multiple could compress further, particularly given the high customer concentration with Walmart and Amazon.

Conclusion

The Simply Good Foods Company is undergoing a necessary and deliberate portfolio transformation that creates near-term financial headwinds but positions Quest and OWYN as the primary drivers of future growth. Quest's salty snacks platform, approaching $1 billion in sales with 34% growth and expanding manufacturing capacity, demonstrates the brand's ability to disrupt mainstream categories and generate superior contribution margins. OWYN's clean label leadership in plant-based nutrition, despite temporary quality setbacks, addresses a structural consumer trend with significant runway given low awareness and distribution.

The strategic rationalization of Atkins, while painful with 20% expected consumption declines and a $60.9 million impairment, reflects management's discipline in allocating resources to higher-return opportunities. This transition's success depends on three critical variables: maintaining Quest's innovation velocity and market share gains, accelerating OWYN's distribution and trial recovery, and navigating inflationary pressures while preserving gross margin structure.

Trading at 8.1x EBITDA with an 8% free cash flow yield, the stock's valuation appears to discount execution risk while undervaluing the long-term earnings power of a restructured portfolio. The "tale of two halves" guidance framework requires investors to look through FY2026's margin compression to the underlying health of Quest and OWYN. If management delivers on its promise to return to growth in H2 and positions the company for stronger FY2027 performance, the current valuation will likely prove attractive. The key monitorables remain Atkins' distribution stability, OWYN's quality perception recovery, and Quest's ability to sustain double-digit growth amid intensifying competition.

Finish reading this report on SMPL

You've reached your limit of 3 free reports this month. Unlock this report and get unlimited access to our full library of US equity research.

Join 300,000+ investors reading our research.

Continue with Google
or

Forever free account. No credit card required.

Already have an account? Log in

The most compelling investment themes are the ones nobody is talking about yet.

Every Monday, get three under-the-radar themes with catalysts, data, and stocks poised to benefit.

Sign up now to receive them!

Also explore our analysis on 5,000+ stocks